The Democrats are having conniptions over new voting laws in multiple states. Every single new law is “voter suppression”. If one compares some of the new with existing laws, you will find, in fact, the new laws are more voter friendly. The malarkey’s have a message.
Everything Is Voter Suppression
Machiavellian Malarkey
The substantive debate we should be having regarding election integrity has been covered as a breathless referendum over supposed voter suppression. Either you let Stacey Abrams set the rules or you’re a deplorable racist.
We’d expect such malarkey from enterprising Democrats seeking to lock-in a permanent ballot box advantage, but the media has abandoned any pretense of professionalism and balance.
In response to a new Politico piece, Matt Whitlock tweeted: “I don’t think anyone is trying to be nefarious, but if a single article is quoting 10 liberal groups on a national debate, having ONE conservative isn’t too much to ask. Re-upping my ‘5 basic requests for coverage of the election policy debate.’ None of which are controversial.”
Below are the “5 basic requests for coverage of the election debate policy”.
For me, I find the declaration requiring ‘voter ID’ to be suppression laughable. According to the “them”, it disenfranchises those with no ID. REALLY? Since 9-11, exactly how many people do not have some form of ID? Rhetorical question!