Year: 2021

  • U.S. Embassy in Kabul Sends Out Thousands of Blank VISA Documents

    U.S. Embassy in Kabul Sends Out Thousands of Blank VISA Documents

    U.S. Embassy in Kabul Sends Out Thousands of Blank VISA Documents Which Are Easy to Falsify and Makes Things Worse

    David Fox is an American trapped in Kabul who appeared on a video report with ABC to highlight the situation faced by thousands of Americans attempting to evacuate the region. While he was describing the dangerous situation around the Kabul airport, Mr. Fox also pointed out a very serious issue.  ABC buried the lead….

    According to his report, the U.S. State Department responded en masse to all the people trapped in Afghanistan reaching out for help.

    The U.S. Embassy consular services department sent a document with instructions to assist Americans and eligible Afghans claiming Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) status. The document looks exactly like an approved VISA document except there is no filled in name, no serial number and no barcode.

    As Mr. Fox notes, the document is easily able to be forged which makes the Kabul airport situation even worse, as it is likely the people who receive this response from the consular’s office will duplicate it and share it with friends or family who can then use it in an effort to get to the United States.

    [WATCH ABC News video at 06:25]

    Mr. Fox attributes this massive problem to bureaucratic “brainworms“, or a mistake by professional bureaucrats within the State Department trying to help but actually making things worse.  However, there is a possibility it’s not a mistake.  Perhaps this was done purposefully.

    As previously noted by Lara Logan, outlining a position I happen to agree with {GO DEEP}, the growing scale of the crisis in Afghanistan cannot simply be chalked up to mistakes, snafu’s, blunders and errors in judgement.  At some level it must be accepted that these events are happening because they are intended to happen.

    While it is never a good idea to assign duplicitous motives to issues and events which can be more easily explained by stupid errors, the scale of the errors in this situation beggars belief.

    When you think about the people within the chain-of-command inside the U.S. State Department, specifically the number of people currently assigned to review everything U.S. Embassy Kabul operations is conducting, this instruction to blitz a document to all applicants, that is so easy to duplicate had to be made intentionally.

    Tens of thousands of fraudulent State Department documents showing up at the already overwhelmed gates of the Kabul airport will only make things exponentially more difficult to sort through.

    Something like this is beyond FUBAR.  This level of specific evacuation crisis is benefitting some purpose.  Essentially, this “mistake” as outlined in the video above, is going to collapse any hope for an efficient evacuation with verified personnel.

    We have seen this play out before [Bathtub Principle] where a crisis is created because the crisis has a purpose.

    In Libya rather than Hillary Clinton and CIA Director Leon Panetta getting busted for selling surface-to-air missiles (SAMS) to al-Qaeda (Operation Zero Footprint), the State Department and CIA -essentially brother and sister agencies- helped “the Benghazi rebels” take over the Kadaffi weapons caches.  If SAMS were then used elsewhere (Syria), well, they came from Kadaffi’s stores… see how that works?

    Based on current political alignment, alliances, and the ideology behind who is in charge of specific U.S. government agencies, it can reasonably be assumed someone (insert Obama here) wants Pakistan and Iran to have advanced military technology via the stolen weapons we leave behind in Afghanistan. 

    Why?

    Because those same people already made money selling advanced military tech to Iran, and this ‘crisis’ provides cover when it shows up later in their arsenal. (more)

    “Something is going on”… Something much more consequential than appears at the surface.

    We can see the ducks moving fast, but under the surface their feet are moving much faster.

    August 21, 2021 – https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/08/21/u-s-embassy-in-kabul-sends-out-thousands-of-blank-visa-documents-which-are-easy-to-falsify-and-makes-things-worse/

  • Snapshot

    Snapshot

    Looking at that camera

    if it seems like a lifetime ago

    when you took a roll of film to Woolworth or Rexall Drug to get developed, in the hopes you got at least

    a half decent pictures out 20

    that’s because it was a lifetime ago

    Here’s some French people being denied entry to buy food

    Joseph Stalin is that you?

    ehf fauci….

    I’ll get a 2nd opinion

    Being an INFIDEL

    that makes me a Watchman of sorts

    who does mr. taliban follow on the twatter

    While hearing & seeing this video

    a name came straight away

    if you thought President Trump, you’d be wrong

    it was Charlie Daniels

  • UK, France Sending….

    UK, France Sending….

    UK, France Sending in Troops to Rescue Citizens

    While US Relies on Taliban for Safe Passage of Americans

    British paratroopers were headed for Kabul to help rescue the 4,000 U.K. nationals left trapped outside of the airport. Reportedly, those operatives were told to “prepare for face-to-face combat” if that’s what it took to save British citizens.

    This is just way to embarrassing. The French are doing a better job for their citizens. THE FRENCH!!

    French security forces successfully evacuated more than 200 French citizens and Afghan refugees in a “sensitive operation.”

    Meanwhile our Secretary Scaredy of Defense says; 

    “U.S. doesn’t have the “capability” to conduct such operations.”

    Did all of our 5000 troops refuse to assist in the effort? 

    The Biden administration’s strategy is largely centered on negotiating with the Taliban, according to Austin. 

    Austin stated:

    “We’ve gone back and tried to — and reinforce to the Taliban that if they have credentials, they need to be allowed through,” 

    You know. We have saved the French innumerable times. Maybe, in this case, they could step up and help save some US citizens. 

  • Welcome to Saturday, 21 August Conversation

    Welcome to Saturday, 21 August Conversation

     Over Black Coffee and Gunpowder Tea

    served with 


    I am unable to say how many times I have thought the same thing.

  • No American Military….

    No American Military….

    No American Military Leader Should Ever

    Say What Lloyd Austin Said

    Dan McLaughlin for National Review August 19, 2021 1:16 PM

    Can you imagine Norman Schwarzkopf — to say nothing of Dwight Eisenhower or Douglas MacArthur — making this statement?

    There are an estimated 10,000–15,000 Americans in Afghanistan now who need to be evacuated as the Taliban seize control of the country. Anyone left behind could find themselves reliving the 1979 Iranian hostage crisis or the hostage crisis in Lebanon shortly thereafter. The Taliban are undoubtedly well aware of the leverage they could obtain by holding Americans hostage. Evacuation is therefore not just a pressing humanitarian matter; it is essential to preventing a bunch of Stone Age barbarians from dictating terms to the United States of America.

    The Biden administration has not exactly exuded confidence in the face of this threat. On Tuesday, the State Department sent a cable to thousands of Americans in the country telling them to make their way to Kabul’s soon-to-be-renamed Hamid Karzai Airport (we already abandoned Bagram Airfield) but warning them, “Please Be Advised That The United States Cannot Guarantee Your Security As You Make This Trip.”

    Then, in a briefing this morning, Defense Department spokesman John Kirby admittedthat the administration not only does not know how many Americans are trapped in Afghanistan, they do not even know how many have been evacuated.

    Worst of all, at a Pentagon briefing Wednesday, when Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin was asked about the U.S. military’s capability to get its citizens out of Afghanistan, his answer was jaw-dropping: “We don’t have the capability to go out and collect large numbers of people.” You have to watch Austin deliver this line to grasp its full air of defeatism about a place where our military has moved about with some impunity for two decades, while General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a fellow Army lifer, stood by looking as if someone had just shot his dog.

    The best Austin could offer was a promise to try, at least for a while:

    “We’re gonna get everyone that we can possibly evacuate evacuated, and I’ll do that as long as we possibly can, until the clock runs out, or we run out of capability. . . . I don’t have the capability to go out and extend operations currently into Kabul.”

    This is unacceptable. This is un-American. This is not what our Army is about. Can you imagine, say, Norman Schwarzkopf — to say nothing of Dwight Eisenhower or Douglas MacArthur — giving that answer? What is wrong with these men? What have they been doing with the $700 billion we spend on national defense? What do they think that money is for, if not to protect Americans in danger, be they at home or abroad, civilians or military?

    Hardly anything is more central to the ethos of our Army than the credo, “Leave no man behind.” When we evacuate or retreat — and even the best armies must expect do these things from time to time — no stone is unturned, no risk unrun to make certain that we leave nobody behind. That is drilled into every soldier from the very start of their training. Secretary Austin and General Milley have, between them, nearly 80 years of service in the Army behind them, a good part of that in combat. How can they have become so immersed in the culture of bureaucracy that they have forgotten who they are and where they came from?

    Austin and Milley should be sacked immediately and replaced with people who know what their job is. Abraham Lincoln would have demanded their resignations, as he did repeatedly to generals who wouldn’t fight. He sacked his first secretary of war and exiled him to Russia. Joe Biden could take a lesson.

    It doesn’t matter how hard the job is, or how strained the military’s capacity is right now. It doesn’t even matter if you expect from experience that the mission will fall short of its goals. You do not say out loud that we cannot guarantee the safe evacuation of Americans from the clutches of the Taliban. You do not even allow yourself to think it so long as you have tools at your disposal to prevent it. The lives of over 10,000 Americans and the credibility of the nation’s promise to protect them are at stake. The only acceptable answers in this situation are twofold, and they should be declared long and loud so that the entire world can hear them:

    One, we will move heaven and earth to get every last American home safely.

    Two, if even a hair on their heads should be harmed, we will paint the streets with Taliban blood on our way out the door in retribution. Recall the speech that Vito Corleone gives to the heads of the other Mafia families in The Godfather about ensuring Michael’s safety upon his return from Sicily:

    In hours of crisis, nations and armies survive on a can-do spirit and a determination to overcome every obstacle. When the British Expeditionary Force was stranded at Dunkirk, Winston Churchill didn’t say, “Well, we don’t have the capability.” When the Royal Navy was short of that capacity, he put out a call for volunteers and sent civilian fishing boats — some of them even with civilian sailors — across the English Channel into a war zone under the threat of bombardment by the Luftwaffe. When the Soviets blockaded West Berlin in 1948, Harry Truman launched the Berlin Airlift; American and British relief planes flew 250,000 missions to keep West Berlin supplied, collectively flying almost the distance from the earth to the Sun. In 1942, when the USS Yorktownreturned to Hawaii from the Battle of the Coral Sea needing months’ worth of repair, Admiral Chester Nimitz did not say, “Sorry, we do not have the capability.” He met the ship at the docks with 1,400 workmen who labored around the clock and put the carrier back to sea in less than three days, changing the course of the Battle of Midway. In 1914, when Paris was threatened, General Joseph Gallieni pressed thousands of taxis into service to ensure that every soldier he could find was able to get to the Marne to stop the German advance. In the fall of 1863, when the Union garrison at Chattanooga was nearly surrounded and starving, Secretary of War Edwin Stanton did not say, “We do not have the capability.” He summoned the presidents of all the railroads to his office, worked through the night commandeering and personally rerouting their schedules, and had men on the move within 40 hours. Within less than two weeks, 20,000 men had reached Chattanooga with all their artillery, horses, and baggage.

    And Joe Biden? He went back to his vacation.

    Even amidst the collapse and national war-weariness at the end of the Vietnam War, Gerald Ford did not accept that Americans should be left behind and held hostage. When the merchant vessel the SS Mayaguez was captured by the Khmer Rouge and its crew held hostage, Ford sent in the Marines. When some of his Electronic Data Systems employees were taken by the Iranians in 1979, Ross Perot did not throw his hands up and say, “We’re a computer company, not an army.” He hired a private commando force, including military veterans working for EDS, and had his men rescued. Even Jimmy Carter at least attempted the same thing.

    It was once a point of pride for great nations, from the Roman Empire to the British Empire, that they would protect their citizens anywhere in the world, and woe betide those who brought them harm. The most famous invocation of this principle came in 1850, after an anti-Semitic mob in Greece had sacked the house of David Pacifico. Don Pacifico, as he was known, was a Spanish Jew doubling as Portuguese consul in Athens, but he had been born in Gibraltar and claimed British citizenship. Lord Palmerston, the British foreign secretary, sent a squadron of the Royal Navy to blockade Greek ports and demand compensation, even risking war with France and Russia on the principle. When called in the House of Commons to defend this, he gave a memorable speech that carried the country with him, saying that what was at stake in the Don Pacifico affair was “whether, as the Roman, in days of old, held himself free from indignity, when he could say Civis Romanus sum [I am a Roman citizen]; so also a British subject, in whatever land he may be, shall feel confident that the watchful eye and the strong arm of England, will protect him against injustice and wrong.” That was the same spirit in which Thomas Jefferson sent the Marines all the way to Tripoli to stop the Barbary Pirates, or that Theodore Roosevelt responded to the kidnapping of an American businessman, Ion Perdicaris, by a Moroccan leader named Raisuli by having his secretary of state declare, “This government wants Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead.” It was not so long ago that even such a redoubt of liberal opinion as The West Wing still venerated that idea:

    What happened to the can-do-what-we-must-do determination of Edwin Stanton or Chester Nimitz? If you know anybody who has served in the ranks of the U.S. military over the past two decades, you know that the problem is not the men and women in uniform. If Joe Biden’s generals have lost that sense of their mission, he should find some generals who remember it.

  • $1 Trillion Of Lithium & Other Minerals In Afghanistan: …

    $1 Trillion Of Lithium & Other Minerals In Afghanistan: …

    $1 Trillion Of Lithium & Other Minerals In Afghanistan: Will A New Great Game Begin Under Taliban?

    In 2010, US military officials and geologists revealed that Afghanistan has huge reserves of minerals. These $1 trillion worth of mineral deposits have now slipped into the Taliban’s hands. Afghanistan is estimated to have the world’s biggest deposits of lithium that could rival those in Bolivia. Taliban may decide to tap these natural resources to boost its wealth and control on the nation. Watch the video to know more.

  • Free rent paid for by….

    Free rent paid for by….

    No, that is not a real headline; however, what the State Department is charging evacuees could be construed in such a manner.

    The highlighted, in blue, tells the story.
    Under normal circumstances, I could agree with the charge. These are NOT normal circumstances.

  • FBI Shoots Down Dem ‘Conspiracy Theory’ That Jan. 6…

    FBI Shoots Down Dem ‘Conspiracy Theory’ That Jan. 6…

    FBI Shoots Down Dem ‘Conspiracy Theory’ That Jan. 6 Capitol Riot Was Pre-Planned

    Many Democratic leaders, including – most notably – Nancy Pelosi refuse to let go of the notion that the Jan. 6 “attack” on the Capitol was a terror attack on par with 9/11 or the Pulse nightclub shootings. Why? Because, they claim, the whole seige was planned and perpetrated by shadowy militia groups like the Oath Keepers, working in concert with Republican lawmakers.

    Dems also blame President Trump for instigating the incident (the supposed reason behind Twitter and Facebook banning his accounts).

    But according to a scoop from Reuters published Friday, prosecutors who once planned to try and lay charges of sedition, conspiracy or other serious offenses against members of the Oath Keepers and other militia groups have been stymied by the reality of what actually happened. And now that the first (surprisingly stiff) jail sentences have been handed down, the FBI has apparently determined that there’s “scant evidence” to suggest that the events of Jan. 6 resulted from an “organized plot”, according to a scoop published by Reuters.

    In other words, it’s a repudiation of prosecutors’ claims that “trespassing plus thought crime = terrorism”.

    The FBI tells Reuters that “95%” of these cases are “one offs”. And even among the “5%” who were more organized, there is still no evidence of a “grand scheme” to overthrow Congress and install President Trump for a second term.

    Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.

    “Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases,” said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. “Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized. But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages.”

    But that’s not even the most disappointing bit for Pelosi, who is trying to use her Jan. 6 Committee to punish GOP colleagues. Because the FBI also told Reuters that there’s no evidence that Trump, or people around him, were involved in organizing the unrest.

    But the FBI has so far found no evidence that [Trump] or people directly around him were involved in organizing the violence, according to the four current and former law enforcement officials.

    The report specifically cited “dirty trickster” Roger Stone (who was famously taken into custody by a SWAT team for a perp walk in front of CNN cameras) and InfoWars founder Alex Jones.

    Stone, a veteran Republican operative and self-described “dirty trickster”, and Jones, founder of a conspiracy-driven radio show and webcast, are both allies of Trump and had been involved in pro-Trump events in Washington on Jan. 5, the day before the riot.

    FBI investigators did find that cells of protesters, including followers of the far-right Oath Keepers and Proud Boys groups, had aimed to break into the Capitol. But they found no evidence that the groups had serious plans about what to do if they made it inside, the sources said.

    The findings could also help the 40 or so defendants who belong to militia groups, and are facing more serious conspiracy charges. As we first learned a few weeks ago, prosecutors feel they don’t have enough evidence to lay charges of “seditious conspiracy”, or use the RICO act to target militia groups as if they were an organized criminal gang.

    But one source said there has been little, if any, recent discussion by senior Justice Department officials of filing charges such as “seditious conspiracy” to accuse defendants of trying to overthrow the government. They have also opted not to bring racketeering charges, often used against organized criminal gangs.

    Senior lawmakers have been briefed on the FBI’s findings and find them “credible”, according to Reuters. The ultimate takeaway is this: while some groups may have discussed the rally and attendant protest in advance, and while they ultimately may have “worked together” on the day in question, there’s simply no evidence of a grand conspiracy headed by a single nefarious ringleader (not Stone, not Jones, not even Trump).

    Prosecutors have filed conspiracy charges against 40 of those defendants, alleging that they engaged in some degree of planning before the attack. They alleged that one Proud Boy leader recruited members and urged them to stockpile bulletproof vests and other military-style equipment in the weeks before the attack and on Jan. 6 sent members forward with a plan to split into groups and make multiple entries to the Capitol.

    But so far prosecutors have steered clear of more serious, politically-loaded charges that the sources said had been initially discussed by prosecutors, such as seditious conspiracy or racketeering.

    The FBI’s assessment could prove relevant for a congressional investigation that also aims to determine how that day’s events were organized and by whom.

    With seditious conspiracy now off the table, the most serious charges are likely to be the assault on an office charges, which carry a penalty of up to 20 years in prison.
    August 20, 2021 https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fbi-shoots-down-dems-deranged-claims-jan-6-capitol-riot-resulted-organized-conspiracy

    Comment: At this point, I suspect the FBI would like the January 6 Pelosi Insurrection to quietly go away. Assume they would like the same amount of time that it has taken to release the JFK files. And we can be assured, those who have been unjustly incarcerated are appropriately compensated /s

  • the 3rd term

    the 3rd term

    Gun running is so old fashion

    WASHINGTON — For months, the Biden administration was stockpiling military equipment for the Taliban before the collapse of the Afghan government. The report comes from Reuters who shares that well over a month before the Taliban’s march across the country, the Biden administration was sending military equipment to Afghanistan amid a “planned withdrawal.”

    The plans of the Biden administration were not very well thought out or executed.

    But perhaps this was the plan all along….

    The Biden administration had continued to ship new firearms, drones, communication gear, and more to the nation that they had plans to abandon in just a few short weeks. Even as the Taliban takeover continued, the shipments continued. The Taliban has bragged about the equipment they obtained, with videos of helicopters and firearms posted online.

    what would a start-up kit look like for a defense force

    2,000 armored vehicles, including U.S. Humvees, and up to 40 aircraft potentially including UH-60 Black Hawks, scout attack helicopters, ScanEagle military drones and nightvision capabilities

    Official nitwits report they are less concerned about the equipment because it is technologically advanced. They state it takes significant maintenance time and training to operate.

    I’d like hand Modern Milley a Swedish compass… open it milley

    you see that milley. that’s the look of lost

    Both China & Russia will be racing to make friends with the Taliban. They refuse to call the Taliban terrorists and have technology similar to that of the United States. is it possible milley that they provide the training necessary to the Taliban regime. ( asking for a friend )

    the Bite-me bunch will claim that the equipment left behind was not stockpiled for the Taliban

    what other explanation is there? As the Taliban raced across the country, taking it down in just over 1 week, the administration did nothing to stop them

    wanna know why I’ll never be invited to a presser?

    mr. Austin

    since the intelligence FAIL of Tet in 68

    can you explain how mr. taliban planned, organized,positioned and executed this offensive nation wide offensive under the nose of USMIL, CIA,DIA,NDS, ANDSF so on & so forth?

    one follow-up question

    is it true Americans in Kabul are now having to pay 2,000 bucks for a flight out?

    Green is my least favorite mre

  • Welcome to Friday, 20 August Conversation

    Welcome to Friday, 20 August Conversation

     Over Black Coffee and Gunpowder Tea

    served with 


    Military humor for you enjoyment.

    It was our first day on the rifle range at Lackland Air Force Base. 

    I felt confident as I aimed and squeezed the trigger of my carbine for my first shot. 

    “Good news and bad news,” my instructor said. “The good news: You got a bull’s eye.”

    Before my head could swell too much, he added, 

    “But it was in somebody else’s target.” 

    It is unnecessary for me to mention the chaotic events happening in Afghanistan; however, one should…