Tag: Twitter

  • Twitter Updates Privacy Policy Notifying Users…

    Twitter Updates Privacy Policy Notifying Users…

    Twitter Updates Privacy Policy Notifying Users Their Content Will Be Used to Train and Develop Enhanced AI

    The use of Enhanced Artificial Intelligence to control information and communication is a subject that too few people understand.  This is why I have spent time trying to share information so that people can see into the future of their internet reality.  Everything will change.

    As you should know by now, the X platform (Twitter) is designed to produce a different user experience based on “definitions” of the user.  The definitions are applied by the platform, to create unique identifying characteristics of the user.  The result is that each user gets a completely different platform experience, based on their definitions.

    “Twitter is a different platform for each user.”  Repeat that phrase as often as needed to understand the evolution of what is coming to the American internet.

    You might ask, how is applying all of these granular definitions even possible?  The answer is through the use of AI.  Humans will no longer be assigning the definitions of you; an autonomous system will take on the job of assigning the definitions.  Now, keep referencing the word “definitions,” because that is your identity and gateway pass into the platform content.  If you carry a particular definition, you will be blocked, throttled, shadow-banned or experience friction applied to your user id.

    Remember when Elon Musk restricted users and claimed it was because the platform content was being “scraped” by organizations who were using the content to train their Enhanced AI systems?  Remember, Musk saying that, and expressing his concern?   Well, now the platform is telling users in a new X Corp privacy policy, that X corp itself is going to do exactly the thing Musk said he abhorred.

    Twitter (X Corp) is going to use the content you provide to train the AI how to apply the definitions.  All of your interactions with the X Corp product are then going to be tailored based on the definitions that are applied to your identity, your account.   Some content will not be available to you; some content will only be available to you; the key and essential point is that YOU are defined.

    Once you understand how your experience with the X platform is an outcome of definitions applied by X platform to you, then you can elevate your thinking and start to understand what the new American internet is all about.  Your definitions will determine what paths and/or roadways are available to you.

    Enhanced AI will act like an invisible gatekeeping system on the American internet, showing or hiding internet outcomes according to your definitions.  It’s not that the offramp (a specific pathway on the internet) doesn’t exist, it’s an issue of you not being able to see any off ramp.  Your experience online is modified according to the definitions, that are applied to you.   This is why Enhanced AI is needed to (a) monitor and define; then (b) control the pathways of your travel.

    Currently, your experience with Twitter is contingent upon your definitions.  Very soon, that same process will apply to the larger internet.

    There really is no other phrase that seems to adequately describe the future for online life in the United States than to describe it through the prism of the previously discussed shadow banning that takes place on the X-platform for specifically wrong-thinking users.

    It is important to begin with the end in mind.  Perhaps some people are unaware that internet services, meaning the actual experience of using the internet for communication and commerce, are not the same in every nation.  In fact, it is quite a different experience depending on where on the globe you are located.  The differences are driven by internal controls, the intranet of the regional internet per se.

    The internet in China is not the same as the internet in Europe, which is not the same as the internet in Australia, which is not the same as the internet in North America, which is not the same -at all- as the internet that now exists within Russia.  Even in some continents, the internet traffic flows are controlled at different levels within each nation. The “world wide web” is a format, but when you get down to the national level, things change.

    This baseline helps to understand that internet freedom is defined by access to information and commerce.

    To the extent the information or commerce is defined as against the interests of the authority structure, or potentially a threat to the national security interest of the government therein, the internet content is filtered, modified, censored, removed or just simply blocked from view.  This is one layer in the information control system.

    Another layer is the flow of commerce that floats atop the flow of information.  This is where advertising, product sales, purchasing and general e-commerce takes place. This layer represents another option for control; therefore, this e-commerce layer should be considered running in parallel to the information, albeit perhaps indirectly attached.

    When western government applied economic sanctions against Russia via financial restrictions writ large, the layer of internet commerce control merged with the information and national security control systems of the internet.

    Russian citizens were blocked from e-commerce access, specifically from western nations in alignment with the sanctions, and the mechanisms of online purchasing were restricted.  However, the entire world did not participate in the sanctions, and there is a massive amount of e-commerce that takes place, even with the systems of western control financial blocks in place.

    Additionally, there is a large black-market system for commerce and financial transactions that started organically in the aftermath of the Russian sanctions.  Crypto currency, as a financial transaction mechanism, was predictable; however, over time people became even more strategic and alternate transfer systems were created.  You can purchase advertising in Russia, but are you really purchasing advertising – or are the purchasers really just transferring funds?  Think about it.

    I share that Russia example, because I do not want people to get too disheartened in what is going to happen here in the United States.  There will always be a market for information, regardless of the control systems that are created to stop it.  Additionally, there will always be smart rebellious people who think of ways to subvert the intents of the control mechanisms.  Freedom may be diminished from a raging fire to a small burning flame, but it will never be fully extinguished.  WE just need to learn to adapt.

    It took me over two years to assemble The Benghazi Brief, because the background story was so large and complex that it took time, research and retrospection to appropriately contextualize the truth of the issue. {GO DEEP}  The Benghazi attack was a small, albeit deadly outcome, of a much larger story.  The brief walks through everything in context.

    In a similar construct, the Shadowbanning of The United States internet is a big and complex story, and I am only about halfway through the assembly of all the data to put context to it.  However, as time becomes critical, it is important for me to push the information forward – because many of the timelines in the construct are likely to surface before I am complete with the fully assembled story.

    I am going to drop some links that will help serve as a flashlight into the rabbit hole.  Each story may seem initially disparate or disconnected.  However, I would encourage you to think big picture with each of the puzzle pieces that are presented.  This is likely to become a series, and I will create a new “Internet” category on the side bar where I will tag any future elements.

    Please keep in mind, the issues of e-commerce: ie. information monetization, advertising, deplatforming and debanking, are not disconnected from the issues of information control.  The same larger national security system that has mandated (and will mandate), information blocks, content censorship, content restrictions, content removal and various platform control elements, is all part of one interconnected compliance system.  Electronic Commerce and Electronic Information are all subject to the online control process.  This is a public-private partnership on the internet.

    The origin of the public-private partnership goes all the way back to the origin of the tech system in relationship to the DARPA programs and government sponsored research labs.  The outcome of the modern partnership is evident in the Dept of Homeland Security (DHS) collaboration with the various communication platforms or pipes of information. Systems like the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism’s (GIFCT) database, are simply outcomes of the partnership.  There are hundreds more.

    There is a rush now to provide context because Artificial Intelligence (AI), or smart data systems, are launching into the United States internet control mechanisms almost daily.  We are close to the time when AI will be triggered to help control the content of the internet under the guise of national security.

    The timeline for full deployment of the modern United States internet control system, is likely around late fall and early winter this year, in advance of the 2024 U.S. election cycle.

    Everything will change.  Every route of online traffic including Internet Service Providers (ISP’s) to filters and rerouting on Domain Name Systems (DNS), to the Internet Protocol (IP) itself will be subject to change in the form of background shadow banning.  If the DHS partnership is successful, you will not initially notice – much like a shadow banned platform user doesn’t notice their new defined status.  The shift will become more obvious over time.

    One odd outcome will be a regional targeting system.  Depending on where you are in the USA, your online experience will be different. There will also be enhancements to your internet travel based on your profile.  Good thinking users will have benefits that enhance the experience of the user and supports the interests of the national security guardians.

    ♦ Deployment of a Virtual Private Network (VPN) is irrelevant in this construct.  A VPN is like you renting a car without a license plate.  You travel past all the Automatic License Plate Readers, arrive at your destination, leave the keys in the ignition and just abandon the car.  Your personal travel was essentially invisible to the APLR system.  However, when the internet roads are controlled by the national security state, and there is no longer an offramp to the destination, your VPN use is irrelevant – you cannot reach your destination.  That’s part of the shift.

    You will notice I use the term “definition” quite often.  That is because the root of every control mechanism is grounded upon defining things.  When you accept the terms ‘disinformation’, ‘misinformation’, and/or ‘malinformation’, you are buying into the process that permits definitions to determine your travel. Those who define both you and your destination, ultimately control your online experience.

    Now, before getting to a recent example of this construct as it is being built, it is important to return to the e-commerce aspect and overlay the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) index into the world of online commerce.

    ♦ Right now, you can physically boycott Bud Light by choosing another brand.  However, for total goods and services the amount of online purchasing is now exceeding the amount of purchasing in real life (brick and mortar shopping).   Overlay the economic control system (think Russian sanctions approach) with the national security requirements for DEI, amid all online commerce, and apply that layer of analysis.  In the e-commerce world, choosing not to buy Bud Light will become a little more difficult; and those who do support the boycott become subject to the previously mentioned “definitions”.

    I’m jumping ahead, because today there was a big development. As you read this, do not think small as presented – think bigger.  Think beyond the use of AI moderation on a platform, and think of AI moderation on the U.S. Internet System.  Online moderation conducted by AI:

    OPEN AI – […] GPT-4 is also able to interpret rules and nuances in long content policy documentation and adapt instantly to policy updates, resulting in more consistent labeling. We believe this offers a more positive vision of the future of digital platforms, where AI can help moderate online traffic.

    […] Content moderation demands meticulous effort, sensitivity, a profound understanding of context, as well as quick adaptation to new use cases, making it both time consuming and challenging. Traditionally, the burden of this task has fallen on human moderators sifting through large amounts of content to filter out toxic and harmful material, supported by smaller vertical-specific machine learning models. The process is inherently slow and can lead to mental stress on human moderators.

    We’re exploring the use of LLMs to address these challenges. Our large language models like GPT-4 can understand and generate natural language, making them applicable to content moderation. The models can make moderation judgments based on policy guidelines provided to them. (read more

    Do you remember me telling you about what I noticed in the most recent Google spider crawls?

    “The Alpha/Google spiders are not crawling around with their enhanced AI looking for words, phrases or content issues.  Enhanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) has given the spiders the ability to look for context.  The new Alpha/Goog AI spiders are crawling the internet looking for information provided with a detrimental and accurate context.  Those who are applying truthful context are the subversive voices that must be targeted.  Keep this in mind.”

    Google Spider Crawl Result, CTH Subversive Content, July 2023

    As we have shared, the crawl is not headlines, the crawl is in content.  Yes, even content in the comment section is now flagging to the control systems.  Why? Because we operate a proprietary constructed private commenting system that doesn’t have a backdoor and protects you, the user.

    The Google Spiders are newly enhanced with AI instructions, dispatched looking for content and ‘context’ that is against the interests of the Vanguard, Blackrock, Larry Page (Alpha/Goog owners), and the public-private partnership.

    Look at the one I have highlighted above titled “Have you ever noticed this.”  Do you remember it?  [Reminder Here] This content is considered “dangerous or derogatory”. Think about that for a moment.  Discussing the humor of Donald Trump, and the fellowship it creates, is considered “dangerous” to the interests of Google.

    Do not get alarmed, get informed.

    I share this information with you so that you understand what is being constructed and what is about to be deployed on a large scale throughout the U.S. internet operating system.  The U.S. internet will be different.  The social media restrictions became more prevalent and noticeable in the past several years; now it is time for DHS to expand that process to the entire U.S. internet.

    When I wrote about Jack’s Magic Coffee shop, people initially thought I was crazy – but the guys inside the coffee shop didn’t.  Eventually DHS control over Twitter was revealed in the Twitter files.  The same background is true here.  The entire American online apparatus is going to change, quite soon.

    More will follow….

    [Support CTH Here]

    RESOURCES:

    Using AI for Content Moderation

    Facebook / META / Tech joining with DHS

    Zoom with allow Content Scraping by AI 

    AI going into The Cloud

    U.S. Govt Going into The Cloud With AI

    Pentagon activates 175 Million IP’s

    NEW ♦Big Names to Attend Political AI Forum

    [Chuck Schumer Organizes AI Forum – Details Here]

    Use the CTH search function for “Charles Rivkin” and/or “The Rivkin Project.”

    Posted: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/09/01/twitter-updates-privacy-policy-notifying-users-their-content-will-be-used-to-train-and-develop-enhanced-ai/#more-250494

  • Twitter Court Filing Cites Alarming FTC Conduct …

    Twitter Court Filing Cites Alarming FTC Conduct …

    Twitter Court Filing Cites Alarming FTC Conduct Pressuring Consent Decree Arbiter to Target Elon Musk and Company

    Prior to Elon Musk taking control of Twitter, the social media company entered a consent decree with the Federal Trade Commission putting a neutral arbiter from Ernst & Young in an oversight position for the company’s privacy, data collection and information security protocols.  Given what we know about DHS and FBI control and influence over Twitter content, there is a certain irony in the prior position of the FTC regarding user privacy.

    That said, Twitter’s new parent company X Corp filed a court motion Thursday [PDF HERE] asking a federal court overseeing the settlement to either throw out the consent decree entirely, or put it on hold until the FTC turns over documents to Twitter showing historic bias against the company. Twitter is also seeking to bar the FTC from deposing CEO Elon Musk over issues that preceded his arrival.

    Within the filing, Twitter presents some alarming information as shared by Ernst and Young about the FTC pressure applied to them.

    [SOURCE LINK]

    House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan questioned FTC Chair Lina Khan about this issue today during a congressional hearing.

    Posted: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/07/13/twitter-court-filing-cites-alarming-ftc-conduct-pressuring-consent-decree-arbiter-to-target-elon-musk-and-company/

  • Who is Meta?

    Who is Meta?

    Meta Platforms, Inc., formerly named Facebook, Inc., and TheFacebook, Inc., is an American multinational technology conglomerate based in Menlo Park, California. The company owns and operates Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and WhatsApp, among other products and services. Wikipedia

    FoundersMark ZuckerbergEduardo SaverinAndrew McCollumDustin MoskovitzChris Hughes

    HeadquartersMenlo Park, California, United States

    Founded: February 2004, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

    Stock priceMETA (NASDAQ) US$291.76 -0.23 (-0.08%)
    Jul 7, 11:29 a.m. EDT – Disclaimer

    CEOMark Zuckerberg (Jul 2004–)

    SubsidiariesWhatsAppNovi Financial, Inc.Reality LabsMORE

    CTOAndrew Bosworth

    CFODavid Wehner

    And for all of those who signed up for the newly launched Thread’s site, competitor to Twitter.….take heed

    Meta Launches Data-Harvesting Twitter Clone, Immediately Starts Censoring

    Meta claims that over 10 million people had signed up for its Twitter competitor, Threads, in what CEO Mark Zuckerberg framed as a “friendly” alternative to the little blue bird.

    “Let’s do this. Welcome to Threads,” wrote Zuckerberg in his first post on the app, which is a “text-based conversation app” where users can publish posts up to 500 characters long, and allows people to post links, photos and videos.

    Threads is directly linked to Meta-owned Instagram, which has over 2 billion users. The Twitter competitor is being rolled out in over 100 countries for iOS and Android.

    “The goal is to keep it friendly as it expands. I think it’s possible and will ultimately be the key to its success,” wrote Zuckerberg in a Wednesday post, casting the service as a more wholesome substitute to Twitter. “That’s one reason why Twitter never succeeded as much as I think it should have, and we want to do it differently.”

    Meanwhile, data privacy and censorship concerns have emerged, with former Twitter owner Jack Dorsey highlighting the vast amount of data collected by Threads.

    As journalist Michael Shellenberger notes,

    Within a few hours of launching, Threads was already secretly censoring users and not offering them the right to appeal.

    Meta is already too powerful. One company controls what much of the public is allowed to see. And if Threads succeeds, it will have 80% of the global market outside of Russia and China, according to one industry insider. As such, it’s reasonable to expect that Meta will censor precisely the same way the large news media corporations, including the New York Times, and corporate advertisers want it to. More censorship is what the mainstream news media, big corporations, and their celebrity pitch people have been demanding.

    …additionally, Unlike Twitter, Threads collects data about “Health & Fitness,” “Financial Info,” “Sensitive Info,” and “Other Data.”

    What’s ‘other data’?

    Shellenberger further noted that within hours of launching, Threads was already secretly censoring users and not offering them the right to appeal.

    Threads flashed a warning after users clicked on Utley and O’Hanley’s profiles. “Are you sure you want to follow…?” asked the Threads warning. “This account has repeatedly posted false information.” –Public.substack

    Other Twitter clones who have taken a shot at the king include Donald Trump’s Truth Social, Jack Dorsey’s Bluesky and Mastadon – all of which have failed to gain large enough user bases to cross into the mainstream.

    The new leftist echo chamber attracted celebrities such as Kim Kardashian and Jennifer Lopez, as well as Congressional performance artist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who hit a snag after just five minutes.

    Needless to say, the new platform has attracted plenty of criticism on Twitter.

    Needless to say, not off to a great start.

    Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/metas-twitter-clone-reaches-10-million-users-hours-aoc-says-app-bricked-her

  • Musk’s Tweet-Limiting Move Is To Prevent …

    Musk’s Tweet-Limiting Move Is To Prevent …

    Musk’s Tweet-Limiting Move Is To Prevent The Completion Of The “AI-Censorship-Death-Star”

    Unless you’ve been hiding under a rock this weekend, you will know that Twitter CEO Elon Musk said Saturday that the social media platform will limit how many tweets users can read due to “extreme” levels of system manipulation and data scraping.

    https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1675187969420828672?s=20

    Claiming the sudden change is being implemented to combat “extreme levels of data scraping and system manipulation,” Musk said the daily restrictions would eventually be raised to 8,000 posts for verified users, 800 for unverified accounts, and 400 for new unverified users.

    Immediately, the socials came alive with claims of ‘free speech’ suppression etc…

    https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1675196118215323648?s=20
    https://twitter.com/totSamiy_yoda/status/1675215344489693184?s=20

    But the irony went to ’11’…

    https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1675200845644701697?s=20

    So they want ‘more’ twitter not less? But we thought it was a cesspool of nazi porn?

    Musk said at the time that hundreds of organizations or more were scraping Twitter data “extremely aggressively,” with a negative impact on user experience.

    However, there may be more to this than ‘user experience’ deterioration, or an effort by Musk force more monetization.

    Musk hinted at the ‘other’ reason in April, when he threatened to sue Microsoft, which has invested billions into OpenAI, after accusing the company of using Twitter data for training.

    “They trained illegally using Twitter data. Lawsuit time,” Musk wrote on Twitter on April 19.

    Which brings us to Mike Benz’s excellent discussion this morning of what may really be going on behind the scenes, that yet again – the world’s richest man could be the only one uncancellable enough to battle.

    Benz begins his trek with the statement: “AI censorship is where all of the magic happens.”

    He points out, the Twitter Files showed how The FBI might come in and get 22 tweets censored, but AI is how IEP (and other 3rd-party censorship groups) were able to get 22 million tweets censored.”

    Before 2016, Benz explains, you could not ‘control’ the internet; but since then, there has been an “AI Censorship Deathstar” under construction, which “relies on massive scraping of Twitter data to track trending narratives, to systemically surveil, to build intelligence dossiers, and to track and turn down – all at one – communities online.”

    Twitter is the best social network of all for this massive data scraping (and training) since all consumers of information are also creators.

    This explicitly makes scraping data there far more important for early narrative detection and countering ‘wrongthink’ via fact-checking, Google Ad suppression, political pressure (possibly enforcing hate speech laws like Michigan just passed), or mainstream media propaganda focus.

    Also, on the other side, while Musk appears to have got the ‘Trust & Safety’ censors/bannner/throttlers out of the loop, this massive data scrape allows any establishment-favored narratives to be amplified.

    And it appears to be working as ChatGPT admitted it was unable to access real-time tweets this morning…

    https://twitter.com/TitterDaily/status/1675382027883884544?s=20

    Which apparently pleased Musk

    https://twitter.com/TitterDaily/status/1675383673397338112?s=20

    So – is this just another money-making scheme for Twitter; or is Musk really the world’s last best hope for ‘freedom’ of speech.

    “You are going to see the censorship industry howl over this,” Benz concludes, and “whether Musk knows it or not, he has stepped on a rattlesnake.”

    While the censorship-industry will “in a wierd way, while the boot [of Musk’s tweet-read-limit] may be cutting off some amount of openness of Twitter, it may also represent in some way, the boot of freedom.”

    Watch the full Benz clip below:

    https://twitter.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/1675254646942896128?s=20

    Finally, one wonders did Musk’s move just nuke the AI-stock-boom’s 100x forward-revenue-multiple case?

    Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/musks-tweet-limiting-move-prevent-completion-ai-censorship-death-star

  • PSA From The Best Twitter Account

    PSA From The Best Twitter Account

    A week or so ago, I introduced you to the Best Twitter Account Ever, the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation. Today they posted a timely and thoughtful PSA:

    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674129100783472644?s=20

    Now, you might think just the single Tweet would be enough. And for most accounts you’d be right. But the ODWC takes it a step further. Several steps further. . .

    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674135476935053338?s=20
    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674143249999577088?s=20

    Yah, I didn’t get that one either. It’s from Disney’s The Emperors New Groove. Here’s the scene:

    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674131889265823750?s=20
    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674129779157618696?s=20
    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674135206364696583?s=20
    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674131022819086354?s=20
    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674130411524444174?s=20
    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674134687504125963?s=20
    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674144587789508608?s=20
    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674142460979625985?s=20
    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674129638757486612?s=20

    https://twitter.com/OKWildlifeDept/status/1674132409745395717?s=20

    And scene. . .

  • The Best Twitter Account Ever

    The Best Twitter Account Ever

    Your editor spends a goodly portion of his day perusing the sewer that is Twitter. Mostly for timely news and such. Over the years I have accumulated a wide variety of tweeps that I follow and the best one is the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation.

    The timeline from that account is filled with both wildlife knowledge and humor.

    The alt text on the images is *chef’s kiss*. (You may have to click on the tweet to see the ALT button.)

    By the way, the advice about black bears is good anywhere, not just in Okrahoma. Remember, a fed bear is a dead bear. Your editor has had experience with fed bears, and it wasn’t pleasant for either of us.

    If you’re on the Twitter, I highly recommend giving them a follow.

  • Project Veritas Catches Vicious Twitter Executive Dismissing Free Speech…

    Project Veritas Catches Vicious Twitter Executive Dismissing Free Speech…

    Project Veritas Catches Vicious Twitter Executive Dismissing Free Speech and Mocking People with Asperger’s, Elon Musk Reacts

    May 17, 2022 | 

    It did not take Elon Musk long to react to the second explosive undercover video of Twitter executives disparaging free speech and even mocking Musk for Asperger’s.   This will not end well for Mr. Alex Martinez, Lead Client Partner for Twitter advertising.

    [NEW YORK – May 17, 2022] Project Veritas has published the second part of their series on Twitter. This story features undercover footage of Lead Client Partner, Alex Martinez, an employee for the tech giant, who sometimes speaks on behalf of the company at events. This footage shows a very candid Martinez speaking about how the company’s “ideology” led them to be less “profitable,” among other incendiary comments.

    […] Martinez even made distasteful comments about Musk having Asperger’s. “He has Asperger’s,” Martinez says at one point adding, “so, he’s special.” Going further, Martinez later says, “We all know that and that’s fine. So here, no one’s going to say some f**king crazy sh*t because he’s special.” (read more)

    The successful entrepreneur, SpaceX and Tesla CEO, and world’s richest man responded via Twitter.
    May 17, 2022 https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/05/17/project-veritas-catches-vicious-twitter-executive-dismissing-free-speech-and-mocking-people-with-aspergers-elon-musk-reacts/

    SONY DSC
  • News Bites – Musk Says…

    News Bites – Musk Says…

    The excessive noise you heard yesterday was courtesy of Elon Musk. In case you missed it, here it is live and in person. Enjoy!!

    https://twitter.com/LegendaryEnergy/status/1526638758208147462?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1526638758208147462%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fwatch-elon-musk-says-hes-voting-republican-in-this-election-for-the-first-time%2F
  • Texas man offers Elon Musk 100 acres …

    Texas man offers Elon Musk 100 acres …

    Texas man offers Elon Musk 100 acres of free land to move Twitter’s headquarters

    An Austin-area man is offering Elon Musk free land to use for Twitter’s headquarters should the billionaire choose to relocate his newly purchased company from San Francisco to Texas. Twitter accepted Musk’s deal to buy the social media platform for $44 billion on Monday, which prompted Gov. Greg Abbott to invite the richest man in the world to move its headquarters to the Lone Star State and join three of Musk’s other companies.

    Now Jim Schwertner, president and CEO of Schwertner Farms, is making his own offer to Musk. “Elon Musk, Move Twitter to Schwertner, TX. 38 Miles North of Austin in Williamson County, and we will give you 100 Acres for FREE,” Schwertner wrote on Twitter Tuesday.

    https://twitter.com/JimSchwertner1/status/1518941839474233344?s=20&t=FHgkg__35CXHJXGeu_HC3g

    Schwertner oversees farming and ranching on 20,000 acres of land just north of Georgetown, according to Austonia’s Andrea Guzmán. He said that the move would be a “win-win for everybody,” adding that a business like Twitter would bring a lot of jobs and boost the economy.

    “We think it’s a good idea, especially when you’ve got Samsung coming to Taylor,” Schwertner told Austonia. “I mean, this area is exploding and we want to be part of this explosive growth.”

    Other social media giants with headquarters in Central Texas include Meta and TikTok. Musk’s companies Tesla, SpaceX and the Boring Company are also headquartered in the Lone Star State. 

    “I just think with all the stuff he’s done, he evidently likes Texas, right or he wouldn’t have moved from California,” Schwertner said about Musk. “And I want to be part of his plan if he’ll come visit with us.”

    Schwertner reiterated his offer on Twitter Wednesday in an effort to gain Musk’s attention. He told Austonia his offer is a “serious gesture to help the citizens around Williamson County.”

    Musk has yet to respond to or publicly acknowledge Schwertner’s offers, only posting on Twitter Wednesday about free speech on the platform and SpaceX activities. 
    April 27, 2022 By: Ariana Garcia https://www.chron.com/politics/article/Elon-Musk-Twitter-Texas-headquarters-move-Austin-17131316.php?utm_campaign=CMS%20Sharing%20Tools%20(Premium)&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral

  • Libs of Tik Tok

    Libs of Tik Tok

    Earlier this week both WhyNot and myself posted threads relating to Libs of TikTok. Herewith is some newer results of the WaPo doxing of the owner of the site.

    https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1517145540982583299?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1517145540982583299%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fmadelineleesman%2F2022%2F04%2F22%2Flibs-of-tiktok-shares-twitters-response-to-assassination-threats-n2606241

    As per usual for Twitter, threats are approved behavior if they are made against approved individuals/groups. It is my personal opinion it is time for the ’owner’ of Libs of TikTok to sue the everloving hades out of the WaPo and Lorenza Taylor, the reporter who doxed her.