Sidney Powell: ‘More than Enough Evidence’…

Sidney Powell: ‘More than Enough Evidence’ to ‘Reverse Election in at Least 5 States’

Former prosecution attorney Sidney Powell claimed there is “more than enough” evidence in the public to more to reverse the election in at least five states.

Sidney Powell

Sidney Powell said:

“There’s all kind of precedent for fixing what happened in this election from Bush vs. Gore to other cases as well… Fractionalized votes.”

“That’s exactly what we have here from a computer algorithm that we can prove in multiple counties, and it could prove across the country if anybody would issue an order allowing inspection of the machines,” Powell said.

“The very fact that Dominion and other companies are not allowing inspection of the voting machines ought to tell everybody all they need to know.”

‘The very fact that Dominion and other companies are not allowing inspection of the voting machines ought to tell everybody all they need to know’

“Federal law calls for election records to be kept for 22 months.”

“In this case, it requires forensic evaluations of the machines and looking at all of the paper ballots,” she added.

“We already know that’s not going to match up.”

You can listen to the podcast here: Erskine, speaking with Gen. Michael Flynn and Attorney, Sidney Powell
https://rumble.com/ve65dp-ltg-michael-flynn-and-sidney-powell.html?mref=23gga&mrefc=2

“There were counterfeit ballots. People were saying, ‘Oh, well they did a full audit in Georgia.'”

“Well, if you just keep running the same counterfeit bill through the same counting machine, you’re going to get the same result.”

Powell ended by saying:

“There is enough evidence in the cases before them or enough evidence in the public now to more than reverse the election in at least five states.”

‘There is enough evidence in the cases before them or enough evidence in the public now to more than reverse the election in at least five states’

In January, Dominion Voting Systems filed a lawsuit against Powell for $1.3 billion, accusing her of defaming the company with claims of massive voter fraud in the 2020 election.

Dominion CEO, John Poulos, said Powell’s allegation that Dominion was created in Venezuela was false.

Powell alleged that Dominion had ties to former Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez.

Sidney Powell served in the Department of Justice for 10 years and for the last 20 years has devoted her private practice to federal appeals.

She was the youngest Assistant U.S Attorney and later became Chief of the Appellate Section for the Western and Northern Districts of Texas.

Her peers recognized Sidney Powell as a “Super Lawyer” and named as one of the “Best Lawyers in America.”

Comment: I suppose that we could act surprised regarding the SCOTUS ruling today, relevant the final filing (below) to be given consideration in the 2020 election irregularities – however, Mandamus Denied and no explanation provided. Punctuated with – REHEARINGS DENIED. I believe that concludes the denial of hearing 5000 affidavits filed by witnesses to election irregularities.

Currently, Dominion Voting System have filed lawsuits against attorneys Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, & Rudy Guilani and CEO Mike Lindell. That could make for a very interesting discovery process.

(ORDER LIST: 592 U.S.)
MONDAY, MARCH 1, 2021
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
20M59 BILLIE, ROBERT L. V. BROWN, SHERIFF
20M60 LIGGINS, ELLA N. V. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs
of certiorari out of time are denied.
20-315 SANCHEZ, JOSE S., ET AL. V. MAYORKAS, SEC. OF HOMELAND
20-472 HOLLYFRONTIER CHEYENNE, ET AL. V. RENEWABLE FUELS ASSN., ET AL.
The motions of petitioners to dispense with printing the
joint appendices are granted.
20-603 TORRES, LEROY V. TX DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in
this case expressing the views of the United States.
20-6719 JACKSON, LUCILLE V. WILLIAMS, JOHN E.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 22, 2021,
within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a).
CERTIORARI GRANTED
20-303 UNITED STATES V. VAELLO-MADERO, JOSE L.
20-480 BABCOCK, DAVID B. V. SAUL, ANDREW M.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.
CERTIORARI DENIED
20-249 OMMEN, DOUG, ET AL. V. MILLIMAN, INC., ET AL.
20-283 BASS, AUSTIN J. V. GREVE, PATRICK M., ET AL.
20-374 CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC. V. BUCKLES, ZACHARY, ET AL.
1

20-535 BATES, DREW S. V. UNITED STATES
20-546 MICHIGAN V. MATHEWS, LARICCA S.
20-708 JAMES, JOE N. V. RAYBON, WARDEN, ET AL.
20-717 CITIZENS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY V. EPA, ET AL.
20-762 FERRIER, ERIC V. CASCADE FALLS CONDO, ET AL.
20-844 MURRAY, BARBARA V. FRY, ELIZABETH A., ET AL.
20-849 P. F. V. J. S., ET AL.
20-851 HAWES, ROGER V. LUMPKIN, DIR., TX DCJ, ET AL.
20-856 PISNER, GARY V. McCARTHY, ROBERT M.
20-857 MIESEN, DALE L. V. MUNDING, JOHN D., ET AL.
20-909 RANDHAWA, IQBAL S. V. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
20-920 COLLINS, JEREMY V. PUTT, REBECCA, ET AL.
20-931 HILLIER, WYNSHIP W. V. CIA, ET AL.
20-932 FRANKLIN, BOBBY L. V. LAUGHLIN, D. J., ET AL.
20-956 DZIEDZIACH, ROBERT V. WILKINSON, ACTING ATT’Y GEN.
20-971 HURTADO, GEOVANNY E. V. WILKINSON, ACTING ATT’Y GEN.
20-995 VETRI, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES
20-1005 DEES, SARA V. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA
20-1038 BROWN, DARRELL W. V. COMSTOCK, KEVIN M.
20-1041 SORIA, CYNTHIA, ET VIR V. NYC DEPT. OF EDUCATION
20-1059 MURRY, ROY H. V. WASHINGTON
20-6200 WEBB, RANDALL G. V. UNITED STATES
20-6210 STATEN, DEONDRE A. V. DAVIS, WARDEN
20-6211 ROBBINS, MICHAEL A. V. CALIFORNIA
20-6234 MOYNIHAN, KAREN V. WEST CHESTER AREA SCHOOL DIST.
20-6414 RAY, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES
20-6425 MEECE, SCOTT V. UNITED STATES
20-6466 JACKSON, LOUIS A. V. UNITED STATES
2

20-6696 KOENIG, LA VERNE V. WHEELER, ADM’R, EPA, ET AL.
20-6705 CORMIER, IAN L. V. COMEY, JAMES, ET AL.
20-6711 LEATHERMAN, PAT D. V. LUMPKIN, DIR., TX DCJ
20-6717 KRAVITZ, JAY S. V. LEIS, KENNETH, ET AL.
20-6718 JOHNSON, JASON J. V. CALIFORNIA
20-6729 BULLOCK, MICHAEL A. V. HOOKS, SEC., NC DPS
20-6746 LOYD, JONATHAN V. FLORIDA
20-6749 MORALES, RICARDO V. MISSOURI, ET AL.
20-6751 WALDREP, ROGER D. V. SHINN, DIR., AZ DOC, ET AL.
20-6762 KNIPFER, JAMES W. V. RICHARDSON, WARDEN
20-6815 MUNOZ, ROBERT V. LUMPKIN, DIR., TX DCJ
20-6959 SOMERS, MASON V. FORSHEY, WARDEN
20-6964 MORALES, DALLAS R. V. UNITED STATES
20-6974 WILSON, FREDDIE L. V. UNITED STATES
20-6985 CHANG, ZONGLI V. UNITED STATES
20-6992 MAYES, BOBBIE L. V. UNITED STATES
20-6995 CLARK, FLOYD V. UNITED STATES
20-7002 LANDER, RYAN C. V. UNITED STATES
20-7006 DORAN, JACQUERE V. UNITED STATES
20-7007 COLLINS, VERNON A. V. UNITED STATES
20-7012 RECZKO, STANLEY D. V. UNITED STATES
20-7021 VALENCIA-CORTEZ, MARTEL V. UNITED STATES
20-7026 BERRY, JEROME V. LAWSON, SUPT., FARMINGTON
20-7029 KINARD, ODELL V. UNITED STATES
20-7031 DIAZ, JOSE V. UNITED STATES
20-7042 HOENIG, RONALD M. V. UNITED STATES
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
3

20-299 MILLIMAN, INC. V. DONELON, JAMES J.
The motion of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is
granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
20-641 LSP TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS, LLC V. SIEBEN, KATIE, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice
Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this
petition.
20-976 PENNY, DAVID H. V. LINCOLN’S CHALLENGE ACADEMY
20-977 PULERA, ZACHARY V. SARZANT, VICTORIA, ET AL.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice
Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of these
petitions.
20-6993 JACKSON, CLARENCE V. DC OFFICE OF THE MAYOR, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice
Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this
petition.
20-7008 DEARBORN, BRADLEY V. UNITED STATES
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice
Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this
petition.
MANDAMUS DENIED
20-858 IN RE TYLER BOWYER, ET AL.
20-859 IN RE WILLIAM FEEHAN
The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
20-871 IN RE BRYANT MOORE
The petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is
denied.
4

REHEARINGS DENIED
20-5990 MORENO-RUIZ, MARTIN V. BARR, ATT’Y GEN., ET AL.
20-6286 ARAGON, RUBEN V. WILLIAMS, DIR., CO DOC, ET AL.
20-6476 ALLEN, DERRICK M. V. UNITED STATES
The petitions for rehearing are denied.
5
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf