Tag: AG Garland

  • Wait, What?  Jake Sullivan’s Wife Is AG Merrick Garland’s…

    Wait, What? Jake Sullivan’s Wife Is AG Merrick Garland’s…

    Wait, What? Jake Sullivan’s Wife Is AG Merrick Garland’s Legal Counsel At DOJ?

    The first words that crossed my mind were “SERIOUSLY?!”   Joe Biden’s National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan, is married to Attorney General Merrick Garland’s legal counsel at the DOJ?….  What the…

    The same Jake Sullivan who was one of Hillary Clinton’s foot soldiers, a foreign policy advisor pushing the fraudulent Trump-Russia conspiracy theory, is now Joe Biden’s national security advisor.  That was always sketchy by itself.  However, to discover that Sullivan’s wife, Margaret Goodlander, is the legal counsel to Attorney General Merrick Garland, opens up an entire world of conflict issues.

    As noted by Chuck Ross, Attorney General Merrick Garland is being advised by Jake Sullivan’s wife and overseeing the John Durham criminal probe, which is looking into the role of Jake Sullivan in the construct of the fabricated Trump-Russia conspiracy, the use of the FBI as a political tool, and Sullivan’s lies in testimony to congress.

    (Washington Free Beacon) – A top adviser to Attorney General Merrick Garland is facing calls to recuse herself from the Justice Department’s investigation of the Trump-Russia probe, which has looked into the actions of her husband, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan. (read more)
    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/12/15/wait-what-jake-sullivans-wife-is-ag-merrick-garlands-legal-counsel-at-doj/

    Comment/Opinion: This too will set your wheels a spinning as to why, no one ever seems to be held accountable on any level.

    “It’s all in the family for some well-known members of the Biden administration.

    White House press secretary Jen Psaki, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, national security adviser Jake Sullivan, senior adviser Anita Dunn, White House counselor Steve Richetti, deputy chief of staff Bruce Reed and Presidential Personnel Office Director Cathy Russell each have at least one direct family member working for the Biden administration.”
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-white-house-family-members-psaki-sullivan



  • AG Merrick Garland Weaponizes DOJ With Political Indictment of Steve Bannon

    AG Merrick Garland Weaponizes DOJ With Political Indictment of Steve Bannon

    AG Merrick Garland Weaponizes DOJ With Political Indictment of Steve Bannon for Contempt of Congress

    Eric Holder was held in contempt of congress for refusing to produce documents and testimony in the Fast-n-Furious investigation, and the DOJ did nothing.  IRS official Lois Lerner was held in contempt of congress for failure to produce documents and give testimony in the IRS investigation, and the DOJ did nothing.

    Steve Bannon is held in contempt of congress for failing to provide documents and give testimony to the J6 committee, and the DOJ issues an indictment….

    [In the background of this DOJ story today, it is important to highlight the FBI has given the New York Times evidence extracted from the phone of Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe.  Remember, O’Keefe is suing the New York Times. The FBI raided O’Keefe on behalf of their ideological allies in the New York Times.]

    Today, AG Merrick Garland is using a fully weaponized Justice Department to purposefully, intentionally and willfully target the political opposition of the Biden administration.  Worse still, the entire media apparatus knows this purpose and yet denies it.   Our nation is in a very precarious place.

    WASHINGTON DC – Stephen K. Bannon was indicted today by a federal grand jury on two counts of contempt of Congress stemming from his failure to comply with a subpoena issued by the House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol.

    Bannon, 67, is charged with one contempt count involving his refusal to appear for a deposition and another involving his refusal to produce documents, despite a subpoena from the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol. An arraignment date has not yet been set in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

    “Since my first day in office, I have promised Justice Department employees that together we would show the American people by word and deed that the department adheres to the rule of law, follows the facts and the law and pursues equal justice under the law,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. “Today’s charges reflect the department’s steadfast commitment to these principles.”

    “As detailed in the indictment, on Sept. 23, 2021, the Select Committee issued a subpoena to Mr. Bannon,” said U.S. Attorney Matthew M. Graves for the District of Columbia. “The subpoena required him to appear and produce documents to the Select Committee, and to appear for a deposition before the Select Committee. According to the indictment, Mr. Bannon refused to appear to give testimony as required by subpoena and refused to produce documents in compliance with a subpoena.”

    In its subpoena, the Select Committee said it had reason to believe that Bannon had information relevant to understanding events related to Jan. 6. Bannon, formerly a Chief Strategist and Counselor to the President, has been a private citizen since departing the White House in 2017.

    Each count of contempt of Congress carries a minimum of 30 days and a maximum of one year in jail, as well as a fine of $100 to $1,000. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. (read more)

    AG Garland has weaponized the FBI to target school parents who protest at School Boards.

    AG Garland has used the FBI to protect his family financial interests in school curriculum (CRT)

    AG Garland has used the DOJ to target political rallies of his opposition.

    AG Garland has labeled political opposition as “domestic extremists.”

    AG Garland has used the FBI to leak information to allies in the New York Times (James O’Keefe)

        And now, AG Garland is arresting opponents of the Biden regime while leftists in the media cheer him on:

    Source: November 12, 2021 https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/11/12/ag-merrick-garland-weaponizes-doj-with-political-indictment-of-steve-bannon-for-contempt-of-congress/

    Comment/Opinion: Build back better is looking rather strange. Name ONE thing this Biden administration has done well? The simple answer is, we can’t. However, the magnitude of the exposure to the corruption within the government et alia is on a scale seldom, if ever seen before.

    Freedom never comes easy.

  • Cruz Rips Garland Apart and Mails the Pieces Back

    Cruz Rips Garland Apart and Mails the Pieces Back

    Cruz Rips Garland Apart and Mails the Pieces Back to Him in Blistering Exchange

    reported earlier on a list of questions that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) had for Attorney General Merrick Garland that he needed to answer. It was definitely a barnburner of a list from the demonizing of parents to whether he’s investigating Dr. Anthony Fauci for lying to Congress.

    So I promised you we’d have a follow-up after he had the chance to ask those questions at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing today.

    Cruz didn’t disappoint; he went after Garland with a vengeance and just wiped him all over the mat.

    Cruz brings up the Loudoun County cover-up situation in which the boy in a skirt who raped a girl at one school was then sent to another school where there was another sexual assault and the superintendent lied publicly about there being any assaults.

    The first case has been adjudicated and the boy found guilty, the second case hasn’t been heard yet. Garland claimed that he didn’t know about the cover-up. But Cruz notes the arrest of the father in the first case was used by the NSBA in a letter they wrote to Joe Biden asking for federal action as a sample of “violence” and that Garland based his decision to open a federal effort on the NSBA letter. Now, the NSBA was embarrassed enough to apologize for the letter and they retracted it. But, Cruz said, Garland didn’t have the willingness to do the same.

    Cruz then pursued the question if Garland had looked up any of the alleged instances of violence which he was claiming had occurred in order to open up a federal inquiry.

    Cruz said of a list Garland had given involving 20 alleged incidents, 15 of those incidents were not violent or threats of violence. Cruz then chastised Garland for characterizing that as a “spike” and a justification for initiating federal action. Cruz then pursued Garland as to whether he did any independent research of the allegations. Garland refused to answer, basically admitting the DOJ didn’t verify the allegations.

    Cruz then went after Garland, asking about the potential conflict of interest of his son-in-law running a company involved in teaching Critical Race Theory. A lot of the dissent from parents is coming from those objecting to the teaching in schools of Critical Race Theory. Cruz asked Garland if he had sought an ethics opinion before he issued his memo that could have an impact on the issue of teaching Critical Race Theory in schools.

    Garland demonstrated how one shouldn’t answer a question. He claimed that his concern was violence, evading the question of whether actions taken by the DOJ might have an impact on his son-in-law’s business. Translation: No, he never sought an ethics opinion and didn’t care if there was a conflict. “Apparently, ethics are not a terribly high priority in the Biden Justice Department,” Cruz concluded.

    Cruz then demanded to know if Garland believed police officers who refused to be vaccinated should be fired. Joe Biden has said yes, they should be. Cities are now having to address the question if they do fire people, based on these mandates, that they could be placing their citizens in danger. In Chicago, 1/3 of the force may be in question for failing to report on their vaccination status or not being vaccinated. If 1/3 of the police officers in Chicago are sidelined or terminated because of this mandate, when Chicago is already strained with crime, it will put citizens at risk.

    Garland refused to answer, saying it’s a matter for the state. But apparently, problems of local school boards are not just matters for the local authorities if one applies that logic back against him, as Cruz retorted.

    Finally, Cruz asked if Garland was going to open an investigation into Dr. Anthony Fauci for lying to Congress over the funding of gain-of-function research in relation to the Wuhan virus. Cruz points out that the NIH’s own statements now contradict Fauci. “Will you appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Fauci potentially committing a felony here?” Cruz asked.

    Garland refused to answer, saying they don’t comment on cases. But as Cruz notes, they had no problem talking about the federal effort into parents and potential “threats.” But we haven’t seen the appointment of one yet, so one has to guess that’s an answer right there.

    Cruz ripped him apart and mailed the pieces back to him in epic fashion. He also showed how bankrupt the Biden administration and Garland have been on all these issues.
    October 27, 2021 By: Nick Arama https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2021/10/27/cruz-rips-garland-apart-and-mails-the-pieces-back-to-him-in-blistering-exchange-n464562

    Comment/Opinion: The Republicans have not received many accolades in recent weeks. However, they do deserve a hat tip for keeping AG Garland from the Supreme Court. If you all recall, it was the intent of then former President Obama to appoint Merrick Garland to the SCOTUS after the untimely death of SCJ Antonin Scalia. And again as you may also recall SCJ Scalia was an ardent Constitutionalist.

    PS – Thanks, Senator Cruz 🙂